United States v. Lewis R. Kulczyk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “evidence that would merely impeach a witness cannot support a motion for a new trial”
• stating “evidence that would merely impeach a witness cannot support a motion for a new trial”
• stating failure to seek a continuance or to inform the judge of unavailability of evidence indicates a lack of due diligence
• “The statute . . . appears to require that the defendant mislead the witness as to the substance of his testimony” [emphasis added]
• “[E]vidence that would 15 merely impeach a witness cannot support a motion for a new trial.”
• counsel's failure to inform court before or during trial that he could not locate two witnesses \indicates a lack of due diligence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).