Skip to main content
· 3/15/2005

United States v. Levar v. Wade

Citations

  • 400 F.3d 1019
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4263
  • 2005 WL 590071

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that credibility determinations underlying a finding of voluntary consent are issues of fact but that the ultimate voluntariness finding is an issue of law
  • stating that “[q]uestions of law—that is, the legal conclusion of whether [the defendant’s] consent [to search] was voluntary and whether he was illegally seized—are reviewed de novo”
  • stating that “[questions of law — that is, the legal conclusion of whether [the defendant’s] consent [to search] was voluntary and whether he was illegally seized — are reviewed de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Ripple, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.