Skip to main content
· 7/29/1999

United States v. Lester Mattice

Citations

  • 186 F.3d 219
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 17878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that district courts should impose restitution where doubt about ability to pay exists
  • “The relevant ‘obligation’ under the CSRA ... is the obligation to pay ‘any amount’ past due under a state court or administrative child support order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Walker, Sotomayor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.