United States v. Leslie Russell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing a continuance, “even in the absence of bad faith,” where the new witnesses were disclosed on the fifth day of trial
• “[I]ntegrity and scheduling considerations alone may justify suppression of otherwise admissible evidence offered by the delinquent party.”
• five days in to trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).