United States v. Leroy S. Outen Rodney D. Smith Sheldon Wilford Donald Gordon Euton Christian Tyrone McFadden Herbie Noel, AKA \Wayne\

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Apprendi error did not affect the defendant’s “substantial rights”
• holding that habeas review should proceed during pendency of direct appeal only in extraordinary circumstances because “the results on direct appeal may make the district court’s efforts on the § 2255 motion a nullity”
• noting “the concern that the results on direct appeal may take the district court’s efforts on the § 2255 motion a nullity”
• construing a notice of appeal as a request for a certificate of appealability
• “A withdrawal of an appeal . . . brings the appeal to an end,” quoting with approval the above quoted language from Barrow
• “[A]n erroneous sentence on one count of a multiple-count conviction does not affect substantial rights where the total term of imprisonment remains unaffected.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).