Skip to main content
· 1/24/1994

United States v. Leroy Johnson, Jr.

Citations

  • 14 F.3d 766
  • 39 Fed. R. Serv. 1177
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1240
  • 1994 WL 17327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that Congress's use of \substantially identical language\ to that of an earlier statute \bespeaks an intention to import\ judicial interpretations of that language into the new statute
  • holding that “[t]he fact that Congress 2 chose to adopt . . . substantially identical language [in a new 3 statute] . . . bespeaks an intention to import the established . . . 4 interpretation of [the existing language] into the new statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mahoney, McLaughlin, Heaney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.