· 1/24/1994
United States v. Leroy Johnson, Jr.
Citations
- 14 F.3d 766
- 39 Fed. R. Serv. 1177
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1240
- 1994 WL 17327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that Congress's use of \substantially identical language\ to that of an earlier statute \bespeaks an intention to import\ judicial interpretations of that language into the new statute
- holding that “[t]he fact that Congress 2 chose to adopt . . . substantially identical language [in a new 3 statute] . . . bespeaks an intention to import the established . . . 4 interpretation of [the existing language] into the new statute”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mahoney, McLaughlin, Heaney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.