United States v. Leonard I. Payne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the - 10 - Case No. 22-1033, McCormick v. Gasper et al. decision that certain evidence constitutes hearsay” is a conclusion of law
• finding that defendant’s membership in the conspiracy was sufficiently corroborated by independent evidence that went beyond the scope of the statements at issue
• “In order to admit an out-of-court statement that is nested within another, Rule 805 requires that both statements be admissible.”
• “Statements designed to conceal an ongoing conspiracy are made in furtherance of the conspiracy for purposes of Rule 801(d)(2)(E).”
• applying a dear-error standard of review for factual determinations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).