United States v. Leonard George Durant, United States of America v. Nadine Farris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the inevitable-discovery doctrine applies “when the evidence would have been inevitably discovered absent the illegal conduct”
• “[The defendant’s] connection to the blue Oldsmobile would have been inevitably discovered once the officers became aware of [his] alleged participation in the bank robbery.” (emphasis added)
• “[The defendant’s] connection to the blue Oldsmobile would have been inevitably discovered once the officers became aware of [his] alleged participation in the bank robbery.”
• \[a]ny evidence attained as a direct result of an illegal stop would be inadmissible under the 'fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).