United States v. Leon Davis, Also Known as Flash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing suppression ruling de novo where “parties do not dispute the relevant facts[] but rather whether those facts gave rise to an unlawful search and seizure”
• “[A] defendant does not have a privacy interest in matters voluntarily revealed to a government agent, including a confidential informant.”
• “[W]hat a person knowingly exposes to the public . . . does not receive Fourth Amendment protection.”
• defendant did not have reasonable expectation of privacy to prevent being video recorded with hidden camera in jacket of confidential informant after inviting confidential informant into his residence to sell drugs to the informant
• defendant did not have reasonable expectation of privacy to prevent being video recorded with hidden camera in jacket of confidential informant after inviting confidential informant into his residence to sell drugs to the informant
• defendant did not have reasonable expectation of privacy to prevent being video- recorded with hidden camera in jacket of confidential informant after inviting confidential informant into his residence to sell drugs to the informant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).