United States v. Leo Sure Chief, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court’s exclusion of testimony was harmless as another witness testified to the information
• where the statute of limitations had not yet run when the amendment extending the statute took effect, applying amendment did not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause because it did “not purport to resurrect an expired criminal charge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).