United States v. Leo Carl Munn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding second warning was unnecessary before removal
• trial court retains discretion to pass upon sincerity of defendant’s recantation
• “We do not deem the foregoing language [quoting Allen], however, to be an absolute mandate dictating the return of every defendant who has been removed from the courtroom simply on his verbal promise to reform.”
• allowing defendant to hear trial through broadcast system
• allowing defendant to hear trial through broadcast system

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).