United States v. Leland R. Denison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that the defense of recantation must be raised before trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(2) [now 12(b)(3) ] as a jurisdictional bar to prosecution”
• holding “that the defense of recantation must be raised before trial under Federal Rule of 29 W e note that as a result of her statements, the Grand Jury was required to subpoena more documents and witnesses. UNITED STATES V . WIGGAN 25 Criminal Procedure 12(b)(2
• “[T]he defense of recantation must be raised before trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(2) as a jurisdictional bar to prosecution.... Once rejected, the recantation issue may not be raised at trial and argued to the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).