United States v. Leland Carriger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the reasonable-expectation-of- privacy test did not replace but, rather, added to the Fourth Amendment’s property- based approach
• “[W]hen, as here, an officer enters a locked building, without authority or invitation, the evidence gained as a result of his presence in the common area of the building must be suppressed.”
• Katz and the case law before it, when considered together, should be read as holding that trespassing is one form of intrusion by the government that may violate a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).