Skip to main content
· 2/5/2013

United States v. Lee Vang Lor

Citations

  • 706 F.3d 1252
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 2521
  • 2013 WL 426672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to consider an argument on appeal not raised in a § 2255 motion
  • movant waived § 2255 claim raised for the first time in a reply brief
  • “Suppression hearings do not determine a defendant’s guilt or punishment, yet Brady rests on the idea that due process is violated when the withheld evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment.”
  • explaining standards for Fourth Amendment claims brought in habeas proceedings
  • Stone bar applies to § 2255 motions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Baldock, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.