· 2/5/2013
United States v. Lee Vang Lor
Citations
- 706 F.3d 1252
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 2521
- 2013 WL 426672
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to consider an argument on appeal not raised in a § 2255 motion
- movant waived § 2255 claim raised for the first time in a reply brief
- “Suppression hearings do not determine a defendant’s guilt or punishment, yet Brady rests on the idea that due process is violated when the withheld evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment.”
- explaining standards for Fourth Amendment claims brought in habeas proceedings
- Stone bar applies to § 2255 motions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hartz, Baldock, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.