United States v. Lee Hitow (88-1970) David Long (88-2033)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no abuse of discretion in allowing testimony by a coconspirator regarding prior drug transactions because it was necessary to explain the witness' testimony, proximate to the date of the charged offense, and related to the development of a conspiracy
• “Even if certain comments are found to be inappropriate, they . . . must be examined within the context of the trial to determine whether the prosecutor’s behavior amounted to prejudicial error.”
• “Even if certain comments are found to be inappropriate, they . . . must be examined within the context of the trial to determine whether the prosecutor’s behavior amounted to prejudicial error.”(citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).