United States v. LeCompte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “courts have dismissed challenges to conditions . . . based on a defendant’s fear of hypothetical applications of the condition”
• noting that “courts have dismissed challenges to conditions ... based on a defendant’s fear of hypothetical applications of the condition”
• noting that “allowing as-applied challenges to the condition accounts for unanticipated applications”
• noting that “allowing as-applied challenges to the condition accounts for unanticipated applications”
• noting de novo review of “[l]egal questions relating to the revocation of supervised release”
• “Á district court necessarily abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law.” (quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).