United States v. Le Bris
Citations
- 121 U.S. 278
- 7 S. Ct. 894
- 30 L. Ed. 946
- 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2047
Syllabus
<p>Thu reservation of the Red Lake and Pembina Indians, in Polk County, Minnesota, is Indian country, within the meaning of § 2139 Rev. Stat.</p> <p>Ex parte Crow Dog, 109 IT. S. 556, affirmed to the point that § 1 of the act of June 30, 1834, though repealed, may be referred to for the purpose of determining what is meant by the term “ Indian country.” when found in sections of the Revised Statutes which are reenactments of other sections of that act. .</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The re-enacted sections are to be given the same meaning they had in the original statute, unless a contrary intention is plainly manifested.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waite
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.