United States v. Lazy Fc Ranch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• held, that appellees were entitled to retain funds paid them pursuant to a government contract even though the contract was prohibited by regulations
• government barred from requiring farmers to repay funds acquired from Department of Agriculture pursuant to erroneous government advice
• estoppel granted where US affirmatively misrepresented facts
• estoppel granted where US affirmatively misrepresented facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).