United States v. Lazarski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “it is nearly inconceivable that the court abused its discretion in not varying downward still further”
• noting that when the court imposed a below-Guidelines-range sentence, it was “nearly inconceivable” that the court abused its discretion in not varying downward still further
• explaining that when a district court varies below the guideline range, “it is nearly inconceivable that the court abused its discretion in not varying downward still further”
• treating a claim that the district court erroneously assessed criminal history points as a claim of procedural error
• where court varied downward from Guidelines range, it is “nearly inconceivable” that it abused its discretion in not varying downward further still
• when district court varies below Guidelines range, “it is nearly inconceivable that the court abused its discretion in not varying downward still further”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).