United States v. Lawrence W. Wright Lawrence Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “we need not reach the merits of [appellant’s] argument ... [for] a new trial” because he failed to move for a new trial pursuant to Rule 33
• finding statement made in course of confidential relationship as a factor supporting trustworthiness under the residual hearsay exception
• finding statement made in course of confidential relationship as a factor supporting trustworthiness under the residual hearsay exception
• applying Fed. R. Evid. 404(a)(1), which is virtually identical to Tex. R. Evid. 404(a)(1)(A)
• applying Fed. R. Evid. 404(a)(1), which is virtually identical to Tex. R. Evid. 404(a)(1)(A)
• affirming exclusion of unsworn protestations of innocence by criminal defendant to his attorney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).