United States v. Lawrence A. Hogan and Leonard J. Patricelli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• calling defendant a “real hoodlum” and introducing evidence of irrelevant crimes impaired the independence of the grand jury
• dismissal of indictment is justified if necessary to eliminate prejudice to a defendant or, pursuant to court’s supervisory power, to prevent prosecutorial impairment of grand jury’s independent role
• \Due process considerations prohibit the government from obtaining an indictment based on known perjured testimony.\
• “[I]t is the prosecutor who draws up the indictment, calls and examines the grand jury witnesses, advises the grand jury as to the law, and is in constant attendance during its proceedings.”
• information put before grand jury from a current newspaper article

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).