United States v. Laurienti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it was reasonable to infer that all of the victims who paid into the investment scheme were in fact “duped by the conspiracy”
• finding a “pump and dump” scheme to 3 defraud sufficient to convict under § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5
• discussing broker’s disclosure obligations “on client purchases of particular securities products”
• harmless error where district court abused its discretion by sustaining certain government objections to expert testimony
• If a defendant invites an error and, in doing so, relinquishes a known right, the error has been waived and becomes unreviewable.
• approving “[i]f you had known” questions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).