United States v. Lauriano-Esteban

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even though bilateral “do not cold call” agreements covered just six of twenty-one possible pairings between the defendants, the plaintiffs had sufficiently pled facts alleging a plausible anticompetitive conspiracy
• stating that federal jurisdiction exists in federal enclave cases \when the locus in which the claim arose is the federal enclave itself\
• noting that it “strain[ed] credulity” that alleged conduct occurred absent unlawful coordination
• determining that plaintiff had alleged \a per se violation of the Sherman Act for purposes of surviving a 12(b)(6) motion\ but that the ultimate decision of which test applies \is more appropriate on a motion for summary judgment\
• noting that it “strain[ed] credulity” that alleged conduct occurred absent unlawful coordination
• “whether per se or rule of reason analysis applies...is more appropriate on a motion for summary judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).