United States v. Latik Allah, AKA Christopher Hamilton, AKA \Lye\ William Hamilton, AKA \Star\, AKA \Starpre\

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was sufficient evidence of an agreement where, among other things, the defendant used the pronoun “we” when describing his and his coconspirator’s “inventory and methods of doing business”
• “In order to prove that a defendant ‘knowingly’ engaged in prohibited conduct, the government need only show that he knew he was engaging in that conduct, not that he knew his conduct was unlawful.”
• “[F]irearms are inherently dangerous devices.”
• “[F]irearms are inherently dangerous devices.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).