Skip to main content
· 2/6/2006

United States v. Lashon Browning

Citations

  • 436 F.3d 780
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2825
  • 2006 WL 266508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that district judge properly relied on fingerprint evidence in resolving whether defendant was the same person named in judgment of conviction
  • explaining that “the continued authority of Almendarez-Torres is not for us to decide”
  • explaining that the “continued authority of Almendarez-Torres is not for us to decide”
  • noting that continuing authority of Almendarez-Torres is not for this court to decide
  • dismissing “frivolous” argument that suspect cannot indicate comprehension of Miranda rights by nodding head
  • dismissing “frivolous” argument that suspect cannot indicate comprehension of Miranda rights by nodding head

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Evans, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.