United States v. Larry Woodrow Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]fter such a substantial passage of time, it is unlikely that [the eyewitnesses] was influenced by the earlier photograph, let alone that it led to misidentification.”
• ‘[T]here is nothing per se impermissible about placing the same subject in two different identification procedures.”
• “[T]here is nothing impermissible about placing the same suspect in two different identification procedures.”
• finding a four-man photo array “reasonable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).