United States v. Larry Pust

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering whether the defendant knew “the fraudulent nature of the scheme” in assessing intent to defraud
• reviewing admission of challenged statements for plain error where counsel at times said “no objection” or “no” when asked if objection to admission
• reviewing admission of chal‐ lenged statements for plain error where counsel at times said “no objection” or “no” when asked if objection to admission
• “To establish the existence of a conspiracy, the offering party must show that there was an agreement to commit some illegal act and the alleged conspirator knew something of its general scope and objective.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).