United States v. Larry M. Lilly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court has authority to entertain a motion for clarification of the terms of supervised release
• holding that district court has authority to entertain a motion for clarification of the terms of supervised release
• applying criminal deadline where defendant sought declaration that he had satisfied his forfeiture obliga- tion, which was a condition of ongoing supervised release portion of sentence
• applying criminal deadline where defendant sought declaration that he had satisfied his forfeiture obliga- tion, which was a condition of ongoing supervised release portion of sentence
• defendant sought a determination in accordance with the court’s authority over conditions of his supervised 20 No. 10-1184 release that restitution obligation had been satisfied
• appeal from ruling on petition for clarification of conditions of supervised release is criminal in nature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).