United States v. Larry J. Copus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \the defendant’s subjective intent is relevant to determining whether a ‘combination of parts’ qualifies as a ‘destructive device’ under § 5845(f)(3).\
• refusing to apply Dalton to invalidate a conviction for possession of silencers or the making of destructive devices
• question of whether detonators were designed as weapons was a jury question
• Congress’ power to tax justifies the registration and taxing provisions of the NFA
• same for a silencer and de- structive device

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).