United States v. Larry Harvey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Generally speaking, ‘tardily challenged indictments should be construed liberally in favor of validity.’”
• “Generally speaking, ‘tardily challenged indictments should be construed liberally in favor of validity.’”
• “Generally speaking, ‘tardily challenged indictments should be construed liberally in favor of validity.’”
• “He cannot now claim that he did not understand the charge. If he had genuinely been confused, he should have said something to the judge during the Rule 11 colloquy, at a time when the government easily could have corrected the problem.”
• “He cannot now claim that he did not understand the charge. If he had genuinely been confused, he should have said something to the judge during the Rule 11 colloquy, at a time when the government easily could have corrected the problem.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).