United States v. Larry G. Rowe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that posting to a chat room supported a conviction under § 2251(c)
• holding that publication of an advertisement 3 on the Internet to trade child pornography amounted to an “offense involving . . . 4 transportation in interstate . . . commerce” for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 3237(a)
• holding venue in Southern District of New York proper for conviction of advertising to receive, exchange or distribute child pornography when defendant posted an advertisement on the Internet, which a law enforcement official viewed in the district
• holding venue in Southern District of New York proper for conviction of advertising to receive, exchange or distribute child pornography when defendant posted an advertisement on the Internet, which a law enforcement official viewed in the district
• considering locus of effect of criminal conduct and suitability of each district for factfinding in venue determination
• “Section 3237(a)’s language is broad, and Rowe’s act of publishing an internet advertisement to trade child pornography can readily be described as an ‘offense involving . . . transportation in interstate . . . commerce.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).