United States v. Larry Eddy and Raymond Daniel Eddy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• uttering requires proof of putting forth false writing, an attempt to circulate a check through fraudulent representation as to its genuineness, and defendant’s intent to defraud
• “There was no proof, direct or circumstantial, introduced which tended to show that these fingerprints were left on the check during the course of uttering it_”
• defendant's fingerprints on falsely uttered checks were insufficient evidence to support a conviction absent evidence to show the fingerprints were placed there during commission of the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).