United States v. Larry Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to address such questions because “[b]oth parties endorsed the district court’s prudent decision to conduct resentencing under the advisory guidelines, applying Miller’s principles”
• “Regarding whether a jury is required, application of a statutory maximum or minimum are to be distinguished from ‘factfinding used to guide judicial discretion in selecting punishment within limits fixed by law.’” (quoting Alleyne, 570 U.S. at 113 n.2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).