United States v. Larry D. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a rational jury could infer possession from a defendant’s fingerprint on a gun recovered from his girl- friend’s apartment
• holding that a rational jury could infer possession from a defendant’s fingerprint on a gun recovered from his girl- friend’s apartment
• holding that a rational jury could infer possession from a defendant’s fingerprint on a gun recovered from his girl- friend’s apartment
• holding that a rational jury could infer possession from a defendant’s fingerprint on a gun recovered from his girl- friend’s apartment
• noting that although the presence of a fingerprint was “fully consistent with innocence,” a jury could nonetheless find that fact supported possession
• “Merely touching would not be possessing [a firearm].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).