United States v. Larry Corbett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ALJ “could reasonably disregard so much of the physicians’ reports as set forth their conclusions as to [the claimant’s] disability for worker’s compensation purposes”
• identifying \key\ question to voluntariness is \whether the subject's will was overborne\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• listing section 1201(a)’s three elements, none of which require that the defendant derive a financial benefit
• identifying “key” question to voluntariness is “whether the subject’s will was overborne” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• law enforcement officer who wore Masonic ring and promised to treat defendant like a \Brother Mason\ did not render waiver of Miranda rights involuntary
• “[W]e need not, and hence, do not, decide today whether § 1201(a) may be satisfied USA V. CHAPMAN 19 when a victim is ‘held’ only by the victim’s continuing belief in his kidnapper’s dupe.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).