United States v. Larry Copeland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appeal was barred by waiver when challenge implicated only mandatory minimum sentence
• holding that appellate waiver valid where “the district court read the appeal waiver aloud and questioned [the defendant] as to whether he ‘underst[ood] the appellate rights [he was] giving up in that paragraph’”
• noting that sentencing challenges generally fall within scope of valid appeal waivers
• noting that sentencing challenges generally fall within scope of valid appeal waivers
• dismissing appeal contesting length of supervised release where defendant waived “right to appeal whatever sentence [was] imposed”
• finding defendant’s challenge to his sentence based on subsequent case law fell within the scope of his valid appeal waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).