Skip to main content
· 8/31/2006

United States v. Larry Charles Taylor

Citations

  • 462 F.3d 1023
  • 71 Fed. R. Serv. 133
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 22325
  • 2006 WL 2506038

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a defendant was not seized when he stopped his car and fled from officers on foot
  • finding defendant abandoned cell phone when he dropped it on street while fleeing vehicle
  • explaining that a police report “contained unreliable double hearsay”
  • district court did not abuse discretion in ruling that police report documenting another's statements was inadmissible double hearsay
  • “The report contained only a recitation of the citizen's statements to the police. Those statements fell under no exception to the hearsay rule.”
  • Mr. Taylor abandoned black bag 13 containing cocaine, where Mr. Taylor fled from police officers and threw bag into nearby backyard, and officers found bag with assistance of drug-sniffing dog

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Melloy, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.