· 8/31/2006
United States v. Larry Charles Taylor
Citations
- 462 F.3d 1023
- 71 Fed. R. Serv. 133
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 22325
- 2006 WL 2506038
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a defendant was not seized when he stopped his car and fled from officers on foot
- finding defendant abandoned cell phone when he dropped it on street while fleeing vehicle
- explaining that a police report “contained unreliable double hearsay”
- district court did not abuse discretion in ruling that police report documenting another's statements was inadmissible double hearsay
- “The report contained only a recitation of the citizen's statements to the police. Those statements fell under no exception to the hearsay rule.”
- Mr. Taylor abandoned black bag 13 containing cocaine, where Mr. Taylor fled from police officers and threw bag into nearby backyard, and officers found bag with assistance of drug-sniffing dog
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loken, Melloy, Colloton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.