United States v. Larry Carlos, United States of America v. Charles Steven Baker, United States of America v. Larry Carlos and Charles Steven Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the jury’s role as the ultimate arbiter of facts
• giving jurors impression they may not perform traditional fact finding functions not easily cured
• “Normally, if the appropriate cautionary instructions are given it is made clear to the jury that they are the final arbiters of the credibility of witnesses and there will be no reversible error.”
• “Normally, if the appropriate cautionary instructions are given it is made clear to the jury that they are the final arbiters of the credibility of witnesses and there will be no reversible error.”
• “Normally, if the appropriate cautionary instructions are given it is made clear to the jury that they are the final arbiters of the credibility of witnesses and there will be no reversible error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).