Skip to main content
· 4/25/1990

United States v. Larroque

Citations

  • 741 F. Supp. 55
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4841
  • 1990 WL 101060

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • enforcing a contract that afforded the parties “discretion in determining whether to purchase ... insurance after a policy had lapsed, and under what terms”
  • denying defendant’s motion to dismiss claims under FDUTPA and for breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing where it was alleged that defendants charged “excessive and unreasonable” amounts for force-placed insurance”
  • “Until an express contract is proven, a motion to dismiss a claim for unjust enrichment on these grounds is premature.”
  • “[I]t is not upon the allegation of the existence of a contract, but upon a showing that an express contract exists that the unjust enrichment count fails.”’
  • “[I]t is not upon the allegation of the existence of a contract, but upon a showing that an express contract exists that the unjust enrichment count fails.”
  • “[I]t is not upon the allegation of the existence of a contract, but upon a showing that an express contract exists that the unjust enrichment count fails.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cannella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.