Skip to main content
· 6/25/1990

United States v. Larracuente

Citations

  • 740 F. Supp. 160
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7903
  • 1990 WL 87542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A bill of particulars is not to be viewed as a discovery device to seek and compel disclosure of the Government’s evidence prior to trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.