United States v. Larney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the legal effect of a legally relevant fact is not the proper subject of a stipulation
• granting summary judgment to a plaintiff largely because of an implied waiver of a contract specification by the government
• “[T]he requirement cannot be suddenly revived to the prejudice of a party who has changed his position in reliance on the supposed suspension.”
• government had waived requirement as to the configuration of dishwashing machines where it had not enforced the provision in thirty-six previous contracts with the same party
• “The waiver of a contract provision requires a responsible officer assigned the function of overseeing the essentials of contract performance____Such a waiver by one with such authority will estop the Government.”
• waiver requires party to \reasonably believe[] the requirement to be dead\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).