United States v. Laphonse Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s request to proceed pro se was untimely when made after the jury was [i]mpaneled but before it was sworn
• holding that defendant’s request to proceed pro se was untimely when made after the jury was empaneled but before it was sworn
• “The [Faretta] Court mentioned the timeliness of the request in both the opening paragraphs and the breadth with which the Court announced its decision.”
• “The Court mentioned the timeliness of the request in both the opening paragraphs and the breadth with which the Court announced its decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).