· 4/7/2006
United States v. Lance Pisman, Cross-Appellee
Citations
- 443 F.3d 912
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 8406
- 2006 WL 890764
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he inconsistency in jury verdicts is not a basis for reversal except in the situation in which two guilty verdicts cannot co- exist.” (citing United States v. Powell, 469 U.S. 57, 68–69 (1984))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Ripple, Rovner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.