United States v. Lance E. Eisenberg and T. Lamar Chester, in Re Grand Jury Proceedings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• targets should not be permitted access to information that “would permit them to embark upon a broad scale investigation of their own”
• “We can conceive of circumstances where a district court could seek the appointment of a special counsel to assist the court in determining whether Rule 6(e) violations had occurred.”
• “The court may Subsequently determine whether a hearing should be held on the alleged government violations of Rule 6(e) and whether counsel for targets should be present at the hearing.”
• targets should not be permitted access to information that \would permit them to embark upon a broad scale investigation of their own\
• “The court may subsequently determine * * * whether counsel for targets should be present at the hearing.”
• \We can conceive of circumstances where a district court could seek the appointment of a special counsel to assist the court in determining whether Rule 6(e) violations had occurred.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).