· 5/20/1996
United States v. Lana Christine Acty, Also Known as Chris Acty
Citations
- 77 F.3d 1054
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- crediting attorneys’ testimony that there was no conflict of interests between two defendants
- “The Sixth Amendment right to counsel embraces the right to representation that is free from conflicts of interest or divided loyalties.”
- applying second prong of Cuyler as a “but for” test
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beam, Heaney, Arnold
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.