Skip to main content
· 5/20/1996

United States v. Lana Christine Acty, Also Known as Chris Acty

Citations

  • 77 F.3d 1054

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • crediting attorneys’ testimony that there was no conflict of interests between two defendants
  • “The Sixth Amendment right to counsel embraces the right to representation that is free from conflicts of interest or divided loyalties.”
  • applying second prong of Cuyler as a “but for” test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beam, Heaney, Arnold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.