United States v. Lamont D. Kress

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a double-jeopardy claim colorable because the district court rejected it only after considering a nineteen-page report and recommendation analyzing the claim and issuing a five-page opinion and order adopting that report and recommendation
• court need not consider matters that defendant could have raised in prior appeal, but did not
• where party could have raised issue in prior appeal but did not, court later hearing same case need not consider matter
• where defendant could have raised issue in prior appeal but did not, court later hearing same case need not consider matter
• “Where a party could have raised an issue in a prior appeal but did not, a court later hearing the same case need not consider the matter.”
• “Where a party could have raised an issue in a prior appeal but did not, a court later hearing the same case need not consider the matter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).