United States Court of Military Appeals· 3/11/1993

United States v. Lake

Citations

36 M.J. 317
1993 CMA LEXIS 12
1993 WL 64693

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[Q]ualified jurors need not . . . be totally ignorant of the facts and issues involved in the case before them.”
“Although we do not condone such reticence [to answer voir dire questions] by these members ... they [did not] pui^iosefully disregard[] the judge’s questions or disobey[] any other instruction given by the judge in this case.”
“offieial acquaintance with government witnesses [is] not per se disqualifying”
Court explicitly rejects “reticence” by court members
Court explicitly rejects “reticence” by court members
explicitly rejecting “reticence” by court members

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Crawford, Gierke, Sullivan, Wiss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Lake

16 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.