United States v. Lake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Q]ualified jurors need not . . . be totally ignorant of the facts and issues involved in the case before them.”
• “Although we do not condone such reticence [to answer voir dire questions] by these members ... they [did not] pui^iosefully disregard[] the judge’s questions or disobey[] any other instruction given by the judge in this case.”
• “offieial acquaintance with government witnesses [is] not per se disqualifying”
• Court explicitly rejects “reticence” by court members
• Court explicitly rejects “reticence” by court members
• explicitly rejecting “reticence” by court members

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Lake

16 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Lake
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-01-05· cited 35×
• United States v. Lake
  Seventh Circuit· 2007-09-05· cited 29×
• United States v. Lake
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1967-05-05· cited 9×
• United States v. Lake
  Virgin Islands· 1997-07-07· cited 3×
• United States v. Lake
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-01-21· cited 3×
• United States v. Lake
  E.D. New York· 2002-10-24· cited 2×
• United States v. Lake
  D. New Jersey· 1999-06-23· cited 1×
• United States v. Lake
  E.D. North Carolina· 1966-07-18· cited 1×
• United States v. Lake
  Fifth Circuit· 1985-08-16
• United States v. Lake
  Eleventh Circuit· 1987-02-26
• United States v. Lake
  Eleventh Circuit· 1988-03-02
• United States v. Lake
  E.D. New York· 2003-02-01
• United States v. Lake
  E.D. New York· 2002-10-05
• United States v. Lake
  E.D. New York· 2009-12-11
• United States v. Lake
  Seventh Circuit· 2013-02-22
• United States v. Lake
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-01-21