Skip to main content
· 8/1/2003

United States v. Lafayette, Shechem

Citations

  • 337 F.3d 1043
  • 358 U.S. App. D.C. 1
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15403
  • 2003 WL 21766619

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that no COA is required to appeal the sentence entered after a successful § 2255 motion
  • recognizing that no COA is required to appeal the sentence entered after a successful § 2255 motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randolph, Garland, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.