Skip to main content
· 8/27/1991

United States v. Laetividal-GonzaLez

Citations

  • 939 F.2d 1455
  • 1991 WL 151075

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that denial of basic sanitation can constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment
  • holding that prison officials, who ignored inmate’s repeated notifications of physical assaults and requests for placement in protective custody, could be found deliberately indifferent
  • holding that although prison officials are not required to provide protective custody to every inmate who asserts he was assaulted or threatened,14 “prison officials should, at a minimum, investigate each allegation of violence or threat of violence”
  • noting that prison officials may punish so long as they do not harm the health of prisoners
  • explaining that “an inmate’s disagreement with prison personnel over the exercise of medical judgment does 16 not state a claim for relief’
  • holding a court should allow liberal amendment of a pro se plaintiff’s civil rights complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Engel, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.