United States v. Ladmarald Cates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that new counsel's statement that he needed time to familiarize himself with case did not show excusable neglect under Rule 45
• concluding that new counsel’s statement that he needed time to familiarize himself with case did not show excusable neglect under Rule 45
• stating that the Pioneer analysis is controlling wherever “excusable neglect” appears in federal procedural rules
• stating that the Pioneer analysis is controlling wherever “excusable neglect” appears in federal procedural rules
• stating that review of excusable neglect determination under Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(b)(1)(B) is for abuse of discretion
• stating that the Pioneer analysis is controlling wherever “excusable neglect” appears in federal procedural rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).